From a letter to Mrs Eileen Elgar (drafts) September 1963
[A reply to a reader's comments on Frodo's failure to
surrender the Ring in the Cracks of Doom.]
Very few (indeed so far as letters go only you and one
other) have observed or commented on Frodo's 'failure'. It is a very important
point. From the point of view of the storyteller the events on Mt Doom proceed
simply from the logic of the tale up to that time. They were not deliberately
worked up to nor foreseen until they occurred.* But, for one thing, it became
at last quite clear that Frodo after all that had happened would be incapable
of voluntarily destroying the Ring. Reflecting on the solution after it was arrived
at (as a mere event) I feel that it is central to the whole 'theory' of true
nobility and heroism that is presented.
Frodo indeed 'failed' as a hero, as conceived by simple
minds: he did not endure to the end; he gave in, ratted. I do not say 'simple
minds' with contempt: they often see with clarity the simple truth and the absolute
ideal to which effort must be directed, even if it is unattainable. Their weakness,
however, is twofold. They do not perceive the complexity of any given situation
in Time, in which an absolute ideal is enmeshed. They tend to forget that
strange element in the World that we call Pity or Mercy, which is also an
absolute requirement in moral judgement (since it is present in the Divine
nature). In its highest exercise it belongs to God. For finite judges of
imperfect knowledge it must lead to the use of two different scales of
'morality'. To ourselves we must present the absolute ideal without compromise,
for we do not know our own limits of natural strength (+grace), and if we do
not aim at the highest we shall certainly fall short of the utmost that we
could achieve. To others, in any case of which we know enough to make a
judgement, we must apply a scale tempered by 'mercy': that is, since we can
with good will do this without the bias inevitable in judgements of ourselves,
we must estimate the limits of another's strength and weigh this against the
force of particular circumstances.† I do not think that Frodo's was a moral
failure. At the last moment the pressure of the Ring would reach its maximum –
impossible, I should have said, for any one to resist, certainly after long possession,
months of increasing torment, and when starved and exhausted. Frodo had done
what he could and spent himself completely (as an instrument of Providence) and
had produced a situation in which the object of his quest could be achieved.
His humility (with which he began) and his sufferings were justly rewarded by
the highest honour; and his exercise of patience and mercy towards Gollum
gained him Mercy: his failure was redressed.
We are finite creatures with absolute limitations upon
the powers of our soul-body structure in either action or endurance. Moral
failure can only be asserted, I think, when a man's effort or endurance falls
short of his limits, and the blame decreases as that limit is closer
approached.‡ Nonetheless, I think it can be observed in history and experience
that some individuals seem to be placed in 'sacrificial' positions: situations
or tasks that for perfection of solution demand powers beyond their utmost limits,
even beyond all possible limits for an incarnate creature in a physical world –
in which a body may be destroyed, or so maimed that it affects the mind and
will.
Judgement upon any such case should then depend on the
motives and disposition with which he started out, and should weigh his actions
against the utmost possibility of his powers, all along the road to whatever
proved the breaking-point.
*Frodo undertook his quest out of love – to save the
world he knew from disaster at his own expense, if he could; and also in
complete humility, acknowledging that he was wholly inadequate to the task. His
real contract was only to do what he could, to try to find a way, and to go as
far on the road as his strength of mind and body allowed. He did that. I do not
myself see that the breaking of his mind and will under demonic pressure after
torment was any more a moral failure than the breaking of his body would have
been – say, by being strangled by Gollum, or crushed by a falling rock.
BUY THE BOOK
BUY THE BOOK
No comments:
Post a Comment